Adam asked Staff ago First of all, hello!
I am really being lead about by outreach professionals…I guess it’s because I am searching for some significance…and thanks to this site which I came up against…I stopped and started to think…and I thank you for that…Now to my question:
You wrote, in Pamphlet #1, that life is not created from the inanimate…but in the global sense, according to science, life was created only from the inanimate! The Big Bang and water are the basis of life…I am curious how the expert will settle this…Thanks for your answer…
With sincere respect…
Adam
jsadmin Staff answered 20 years ago
Dear Adam,
We are happy to have helped you understand your transformation and to have contributed knowledge which will open the wellsprings of thought and reason to you.
The answer to your question — Chazal claimed that reproduction of living things is accomplished in one of two ways: sexual reproduction and spontaneous creation of life from the inanimate (e.g., lice, fleas, mice…). The second possibility was rejected through scientific research which has proven that there is no spontaneous creation of life from the inanimate (abiogenesis), only the creation of life from life (biogenesis).
Evolutionary theory deals with the development and slow change of organisms until they took on the features which now distinguish them.
The creation of life from the inanimate is a slow process which is possible, according to the theory of evolution, but the spontaneous creation of life from the inanimate (revolution) has been definitively rejected by research.
Sincerely,
Daat Emet